SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Yoga and Tai chi: a cross-cultural comparative study of health benefits, cultural sustainability, and global public health implications.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The escalating burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) demands cross-culturally adaptive interventions. Yoga (India) and Tai Chi (China) are both valuable mind-body practices. However, their distinct health governance pathways have not been systematically compared. Objectives: This study aimed to: (1) decipher differential health promotion mechanisms (cardiopulmonary/pain/anxiety outcomes); (2) quantitative assessment of the different trade-offs in cultural sustainability (analyzing the communication characteristics under market-oriented and institutionalized models); (3) the implications of different policy integration models for global public health scalability are evaluated. Methods: We developed a comparative framework examining three interconnected dimensions: (1) Health Benefits-by synthesizing clinical trial evidence; (2) Cultural Sustainability-by analyzing patterns in global digital and academic discourse; and (3) Policy Integration-by reviewing official documents and modeling the relationships among all three dimensions. Results: (1) Equivalent efficacy in cardiopulmonary function ( Conclusion: Yoga and Tai Chi represent two complementary paradigms in the modernization of mind-body practices. The former excels in market adaptability and rapid innovation diffusion, while the latter demonstrates strengths in institutional norms and community-based public provision. This study advocates that effective global health governance should avoid a single model and instead construct a contextualized hybrid framework. By selectively integrating the advantages of both approaches based on specific socio-cultural contexts and health system needs, we can simultaneously ensure the evidentiary validity, cultural relevance, and social accessibility of interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.