ArticleProceedings ... ICDM workshops. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining2025
Oral Cancer Detection By Using Tabular Data Synthesis and Classification.
Article in Proceedings ... ICDM workshops. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We advance the state of the art in AI-driven oral cancer screening approaches through a new automatic method for analysis of non-image clinical data organized in a tabular format. In this work, we distinguish oral cancer from precancer (which is its direct precursor) and improve the classification performance by mitigating the issue of clinical data imbalance. Specifically, our work includes two main components: classification using the tabular data, and tabular data synthesis for data balancing and improving classification. We use deep learning techniques in both components and conduct extensive experiments by creating multiple data sets and evaluating several models. Our work indicates that the tabular clinical information can play an important role for identifying oral cancer from precancer using deep learning techniques. The Youden index of our approach is ~0.74, the balanced accuracy is ~0.83, and sensitivity is ~0.90. Our work demonstrates that using synthetic data to balance the tabular data sets is a promising approach for improving the classification performance, and the improvement is statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) with respect to the evaluation metrics: sensitivity, Youden index, F1 score, balanced accuracy, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Broadly, the encouraging results and insights obtained through our work can help motivate new research utilizing clinical tabular data toward improving clinical AI prediction tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.