ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Integrative profiling of lactylation reveals prognostic biomarkers and an immunosuppressive niche in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The overall survival rate of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains less than 30%. Metabolic reprogramming of leukemia cells, such as the Warburg effect, enables them to adapt to the microenvironment and thereby develop. Elucidating the landscape of lactate regulation in AML helps clarify the pathogenesis from the perspective of metabolic reprogramming and identify possibilities for optimizing current treatment modalities. Methods: RNA and single-cell sequencing data for AML were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. Seurat, limma package algorithm and Weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) were conducted to identify candidate lactylation-related genes (LRGs). Enrichment analyses and protein-to-protein interactions were used to clarify the functions. Univariate COX regression and machine learning algorithms (LASSO-logistic, SVM-RFE and Boruta) narrowed the range of LRGs.The DALEX package employed four machine learning models for validation. CIBERSORT analyzed the relationship between immune cell infiltration and key LRGs, while single-gene GSEA was utilized to evaluate the functions of LRGs. We evaluated the associations between hub LRGs and AML using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Molecular docking was used to screen for feasible drugs targeting the hub genes. Western blotting was performed to assess pan-lactylation levels in AML cell lines. qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry were performed to detect GZMB/LSP1 expression in AML patients. Results: Seven hub LRGs were identified in the AML groups: LSP1, MPO, GZMB, SPINK2, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRA and POU2F2, of which GZMB and LSP1 passed MR test. The seven hub genes were enriched in immune and inflammatory pathways. GLM ultimately emerged as the optimal model validated by GEO datasets. Compared with healthy controls, Kasumi-1 cells exhibited elevated lactylation levels, with exogenous lactate treatment further increasing lactylation levels, whereas sodium oxamate administration had the opposite effect. Exogenous lactate treatment significantly upregulated the mRNA expression of GZMB and LSP1. (-)-Gallocatechin gallate and indomethacin bound well to GZMB, while benzo(a)pyrene and benzo(e)pyrene had good binding potential with LSP1. Conclusions: We established lactylation as a critical regulator of AML, and GZMB and LSP1 were identified as lactylation-related clinical modeling indicators, which provides a foundation for choosing prognostic and therapeutic strategies for AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.