ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
The Biomechanical, Biochemical, and Morphological Properties of 31 Human Cadaveric Upper Limb Tendons: An Open Access Data Set.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Upper limb tendon/ligament injuries are common in sport and may require reconstruction using grafts or tendon transfers. Understanding tissue-specific properties is key to improving graft selection criteria and developing new interventions. Purpose: To characterize morphological, biomechanical, and biochemical properties of clinically important upper limb tendons, expanding available data on upper and lower limb tissues that are commonly injured or used as grafts. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: A total of 31 individual upper limb tendons were each retrieved from 8 fresh-frozen human cadavers (3 female, 5 male; aged 49-65 years): supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, long head of biceps, distal biceps, distal triceps, brachioradialis, flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, palmaris longus, extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis, extensor carpi ulnaris, flexor pollicis longus, abductor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis brevis and longus, extensor indicis proprius, extensor digiti minimi, and from the second to fifth digits, flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus and extensor digitorum communis. Outcome measures included tissue length; cross-sectional area, and major/minor axes; failure load; ultimate tensile strength (UTS); failure strain; elastic modulus; sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and hydroxyproline content. Differences were analyzed using mixed linear regression models. Results: Rotator cuff tendons were distinct, exhibiting large, flat cross-sections with high failure loads and sGAG, and low UTS. Supraspinatus was significantly weaker with more sGAG than infraspinatus and subscapularis. Tendon UTS and elastic modulus were largely similar between elbow, wrist, and hand tendons. Exceptions included higher and lower material properties of the extensor pollicis brevis and flexor carpi ulnaris, respectively, than other distal upper limb tendons. Extensor tendons generally had higher sGAG than flexors with significant differences at the wrist and thumb, while hydroxyproline content was significantly higher in digital flexors versus extensors in the fingers. Conclusion: These findings enhance understanding of upper limb tendon properties, providing novel data to inform graft selection and tailor alternative engineered or regenerative strategies. Clinical Relevance: The combined upper/lower limb data sets include 48 unique appendicular tendons and ligaments sourced from the same donors and evaluated using consistent methodologies, providing a robust comparative database to aid selection of suitable donor tendons for the repair/reconstruction of injured tendons/ligaments and the development of graft materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.