ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Nanoengineered phytochemicals overcome blood-brain barrier constraints in neurodegenerative disorders.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative disorders represent a growing global health burden and remain largely incurable, with current therapies providing only symptomatic relief and limited disease modifications. A major obstacle to effective treatment is the inability of many neuroprotective agents to reach the brain at therapeutically relevant concentrations due to poor bioavailability and the restrictive nature of the blood-brain barrier. Plant-derived phytochemicals possess well-documented antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neuromodulatory activities; however, their clinical translation has been hindered by physicochemical instability, rapid metabolism, and insufficient brain exposure. This review critically examines nanoengineered delivery systems as a strategy to overcome these limitations and enable the effective brain targeting of neuroprotective phytochemicals. By integrating mechanistic insights with preclinical and emerging clinical evidence, we compared lipid-based, polymeric, vesicular, and dendritic nanocarriers, highlighting how particle size, surface chemistry, and ligand functionalization govern blood-brain barrier transport and intracerebral distribution. Particular emphasis is placed on rational design principles that consistently enhance brain bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy across models of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and related disorders. Beyond efficacy, we analyzed key translational challenges, including nanocarrier-associated neurotoxicity, standardization of herbal activities, and regulatory gaps unique to herbal nanomedicines. Collectively, this synthesis reframes nano-phytomedicine not as an incremental formulation upgrade but as a design-driven strategy capable of unlocking the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals for neurodegenerative disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.