ArticleHealth science reports2026
Challenges for Implementing Integrated Obesity Management in Municipal Health Plans of Mato Grosso do Sul (Brazil): A Qualitative Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Despite the growing burden of obesity-related noncommunicable diseases, little is known about how obesity is incorporated into local health-planning instruments. Therefore, this study examined the presence and structure of actions and goals related to obesity management in the municipal health plans (MHPs) of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Methods: We conducted an exploratory qualitative documentary analysis of 78 MHPs, guided by Bardin's content analysis framework and two regulatory instruments: State Technical Note No. 5/2017 and Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 424/2013 on obesity management. These documents defined four planning stages: situational analysis, problem prioritization, objectives/goals, and budget forecasting. Text segments that mentioned "obesity" or related terms were extracted and analyzed in the IRaMuTeQ software applying correspondence factor analysis, descending hierarchical classification, and similarity analysis. Results: Among the 78 MHPs (covering 98.7% of all municipalities in Mato Grosso do Sul), 52% mentioned obesity or related terms. However, obesity was rarely prioritized as a strategic health problem. In most plans, situational diagnoses were not translated into measurable goals or structured actions, and none included a dedicated budget allocation. Childhood obesity was seldom explicitly addressed, and primary care actions were described in generic preventive terms rather than as integrated care pathways. Textual analysis using IRaMuTeQ revealed that "obesity" occupied a peripheral position in planning discourse, reinforcing its limited institutional centrality. Only two municipalities' plans demonstrated coherent alignment across all four planning stages, underscoring a systemic weakness in incorporating obesity into local health management. Conclusions: These findings indicate not merely an omission, but a structural weakness in local health governance regarding obesity management. The absence of prioritization, measurable targets, and financial planning undermines the implementation of national obesity policies at the municipal level and contributes to fragmented care within the primary health-care network. Strengthening technical planning capacity, integrating epidemiological evidence into strategic goal-setting, and ensuring explicit budget allocation are essential to advancing comprehensive and equitable obesity management within Brazil's Unified Health System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.