ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Cardiovascular adverse event reporting profile of tirzepatide: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of heart failure, arrhythmias, and ischemic events.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-target-directed drugs: new additions in 2025 and post-marketing safety surveillance of drugs marketed in 2022-2024.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is highly effective for glycaemic control and weight reduction. However, its real-world cardiovascular adverse event reporting profile remains incompletely characterised. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the second quarter of 2022 (FDA approval of tirzepatide) through the third quarter of 2025. Disproportionality analysis was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) with a concurrent full-database comparator (all other drugs reported in the same quarterly files). Because consumers submitted 92.3% of reports, primary inference was drawn from analyses restricted to healthcare professional (HCP) reports (physicians and pharmacists). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, sex, and body weight were conducted; weight-stratified analyses were confined to reports with documented body weight. Results: A total of 103,693 unique tirzepatide reports were identified. Consumers accounted for 92.3% of submissions; body weight was documented in 5,881 reports (5.7%). In HCP-restricted analyses, tirzepatide was associated with persistently lower reporting odds for heart failure (ROR 0.18 [95% CI 0.07-0.43]). Similarly, no disproportionate reporting was detected for acute myocardial infarction (ROR 0.45 [0.19-1.08]), while remarkably, zero cases of angina or myocardial ischemia were reported in the HCP cohort. In contrast, no association was detected for atrial fibrillation (ROR 1.02 [0.58-1.80]) or tachycardia (ROR 1.01 [0.68-1.51]) in HCP reports. In weight-stratified analyses (full dataset, restricted to reports with documented weight), elevated RORs for tachycardia were observed in both weight groups (<95 kg: 1.91 [1.54-2.37]; ≥95 kg: 1.57 [1.20-2.05]); however, this finding was not replicated in the HCP-restricted analysis and should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: In this real-world FAERS analysis using a concurrent full-database comparator and pre-specified stratification by reporter type, tirzepatide showed disproportionately low reporting of heart failure that was robust in HCP reports and across all subgroups. No reporting signal for atrial fibrillation, tachycardia, or ischemic events was detected after accounting for reporter bias. These findings provide pharmacovigilance evidence that complements the safety database of tirzepatide and generate hypotheses for ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.