ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026
Biochemical bone biomarkers in plasma cell dyscrasias.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biochemical bone biomarkers in plasma cell dyscrasias.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Dynamic changes in blood-derived inflammatory and bone metabolic markers for disease monitoring and prognostic assessment in multiple myeloma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological malignancy characterised by clonal plasma cell accumulation in the bone marrow, frequently resulting in myeloma bone disease. Disruption of bone homeostasis, driven by increased osteoclastic resorption and suppressed osteoblastic formation, leads to osteolytic lesions and skeletal-related events, contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) provide a non-invasive means of assessing bone metabolism, with potential applications in disease monitoring, prognostication, risk stratification from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to MM and evaluation of response to myeloma and osteoporosis therapies. This review examines the clinical relevance of BTMs in plasma cell dyscrasias, including MM, MGUS and smouldering MM. Bone formation markers, such as bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide, reflect osteoblastic activity, while resorption markers, including carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks and deoxypyridinoline, indicate osteoclastic activity. Although several BTMs correlate with disease burden and progression, their routine clinical use is limited by biological variability, renal impairment and lack of assay standardisation. As myeloma therapies continue to evolve, further research is needed to define the role of BTMs alongside imaging and clinical risk models to optimise bone disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.