Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949707›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2026

Economic Burden of Recurrence in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Surgical Resection or Local Ablation in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Data.

Neil Mehta, Liya Wang, Shital Kamble, Yan Song, Emily Gao, Abby Siegel, Angie Lax, Sanjana Sundaresan, Adina Zhang, Vicky Wei and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neil MehtaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, #A740, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA. Neil.Mehta@ucsf.edu.
Liya WangMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Shital KambleMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Yan SongAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Emily GaoAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Abby SiegelMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Angie LaxAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Sanjana SundaresanAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Adina ZhangAnalysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Vicky WeiAnalysis Group, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Usha MalhotraMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo curative-intent therapy remain at risk of disease recurrence. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden associated with disease recurrence in these patients.

methodsPatients ≥ 66 years old with early-stage HCC who have achieved complete radiological response via surgical resection or local ablation were selected from the SEER-Medicare database (2007-2017). Patients with evidence of recurrence following complete radiological response with curative-intent therapy were assigned to the recurrence cohort and followed from the date of recurrence (index date). Patients without evidence of recurrence were included in the recurrence-free cohort and followed from an assigned index date based on the distribution of time between curative-intent therapy and recurrence in the recurrence cohort. Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs (2024 USD) were compared between cohorts, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

resultsA total of 309 patients with recurrence and 302 patients without recurrence were included. In the recurrence and recurrence-free cohorts, respectively, mean age was 75.0 and 74.5 years (p = 0.21), with male patients representing 66.3% and 60.3% (p = 0.12). Mean follow-up was 20.8 and 22.0 months, respectively. Per patient per month (PPPM) mean all-cause total healthcare costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort compared with the recurrence-free cohort ($14,697 vs $6223; adjusted cost difference [ACD] $9205; p < 0.01). Similarly, PPPM HCC-related total costs were $11,202 vs $3313 (ACD $10,021; p < 0.01). Inpatient visit costs were the major driver for the higher all-cause and HCC-related total costs in the recurrence cohort versus recurrence-free cohort.

conclusionsFindings suggest a significant HRU burden and high total healthcare costs for patients with early-stage HCC who experience disease recurrence after curative-intent therapy compared with patients who remain recurrence free. This underscores a need for future novel therapies that offer recurrence-free survival benefits and have the potential to reduce the economic burden of managing early-stage HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularCost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedicareNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited StatesCurative-intent therapyHealthcare costsHealthcare resource utilizationHepatocellular carcinomaRecurrenceSEER–Medicare

Identifiers

PMID41949707
PMCPMC13222230

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.