Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41949895›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2026

Evaluating Perceived Value of Pharmacogenomic Testing After a Personalized Therapeutics Clinic Consultation.

Thomas Chen, Amanda S Andriessen, Matthew Jack, David George, Larry K House, Clarence Chan, Kiang-Teck J Yeo, Mark J Ratain, Peter H O'Donnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas ChenDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hospital Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8640-0248
Amanda S AndriessenCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew JackCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David GeorgeCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Larry K HouseCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-9855
Clarence ChanDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kiang-Teck J YeoCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4708-8420
Mark J RatainCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0938-4392
Peter H O'DonnellCenter for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) offers patients personalized treatment by guiding medication selection and dosing based on their genetic profiles. However, widespread clinical implementation remains limited, in part due to patient and provider concerns about cost and willingness to pay (WTP). This study evaluated whether an outpatient clinical consultation that educates patients on their PGx results influences their WTP for PGx testing. As part of the PROTECT-Rx trial at the University of Chicago, high-risk patients received free PGx testing and a virtual consultation at the Personalized Therapeutics Clinic (PTC). Patients completed pre- and post-visit surveys assessing PGx knowledge and WTP. Of 129 patients who had completed a PTC visit as of 1/2025, 76 completed both the PTC visit and surveys. WTP for PGx testing increased significantly from 68% pre-visit to 83% post-visit (p = 0.029). After controlling for social vulnerability, patients who had at least one cautionary or high-risk PGx result were nearly 3 times more likely to report higher willingness-to-pay (OR 2.76, p = 0.037). A single PGx consultation with review of personal results significantly increases patients' WTP for testing, particularly among those with actionable PGx results. Understanding individual risk and the relevance of PGx enhances perceived value, suggesting that patient education is an important component in the broader adoption of pharmacogenomic testing.

Indexed as

Pharmacogenomic TestingPrecision MedicineReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedChicagoFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPharmacogeneticsReturn of Individual Research ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesimplementationperceived valuepharmacogenomicswillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID41949895
PMCPMC13060636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.