Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41950286›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Combating Dermatologic Misinformation on Social Media via a Training Program for Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a 2-Phase Pilot Mixed Methods Study.

Aliyyat Afolabi, Elijah Brown, Joanne Chen Lyu, Pamela M Ling, Andrea M Rustad, Anna E Davis, Beth L Hoffman, Melissa Pugliano-Mauro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aliyyat AfolabiSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9257-8242
Elijah BrownSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-0173-4401
Joanne Chen LyuTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-6746
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6166-9347
Andrea M RustadDepartment of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-2907
Anna E DavisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5960-8051
Beth L HoffmanDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, 130 De Soto St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, United States, 1 412-624-5859.ORCID 0000-0001-6576-8748
Melissa Pugliano-MauroDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2127-1929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rise of social media has drastically altered the landscape of health information dissemination. While these platforms can promote health literacy, they are also rife with skin care misinformation, often spread by nonexperts. This has led to harmful consequences, including improper product use and delayed treatment. Despite their potential to mitigate misinformation, dermatologists and health care professionals remain underrepresented on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram. Objective: This protocol describes a pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a social media training program aimed at equipping dermatology-focused health care professionals and students with skills to create accurate, engaging educational content. Methods: This sequential mixed methods study will be conducted at the University of Pittsburgh. Phase 1 consists of a 5-module online training program completed by 50 health care professionals and students in dermatology or dermatology-adjacent fields. Pretraining and posttraining surveys will be conducted to assess changes in participants' knowledge, confidence, intent to engage in public-facing dermatology education, and satisfaction with the training (posttraining survey only). Phase 2 will involve the selection of 12 participants from phase 1 to apply the training by creating and posting short-form dermatologic educational videos on a study-managed social media channel. Exploratory outcomes include social media engagement metrics, qualitative content analysis of public comments, and individual qualitative interviews with participants to assess audience response and potential knowledge impact. Results: Recruitment for phase 1 of the study is currently underway. As of January 2026, a total of 46 out of the target 50 participants have been successfully enrolled. Data collection for phase 1 is expected to be completed by the end of April 2026. Data analysis will begin shortly thereafter, with final analyses anticipated to be completed by September 2026. Recruitment for phase 2 is expected to begin in April 2026, with the goal of concluding data collection and analysis by the end of 2028. Conclusions: This pilot study will inform the feasibility and refinement of social media training interventions designed to empower health care professionals to engage in evidence-based dermatologic health communication online.

Indexed as

CommunicationDermatologyHealth PersonnelSocial MediaDigital MediaHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairesdermatologydigital literacyhealth communicationInstagrammedical educationmisinformationsocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID41950286
PMCPMC13060740

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.