ReviewPharmacological reviews2026
Emerging mechanistic trends and clinical efficacy for methotrexate: Applications to inflammatory bowel disease.
Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) was among the first steroid-sparing agents introduced for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Its efficacy is well established for Crohn's disease, though studies of its use in ulcerative colitis have largely reported negative results, with only some, although inconsistent, findings suggesting limited benefit. In this review, we provide a comprehensive and up-to-date evaluation of MTX's use in IBD, including its key mechanisms of action(s), therapeutic value, as well as emerging targets that underscore the complexity of this drug and the biological landscape it alters. Despite its longstanding use, the full spectrum of MTX's effects contributing to its efficacy in IBD remains incompletely understood. Although multiple pathways have been implicated, the relative importance of each remains nebulous, and additional, unidentified functions may play a role, particularly in contexts not pertaining to immunomodulation. We highlight recent findings that poise MTX as an unexpected but promising agent for mucosal healing. We also provide a detailed evaluation of clinical studies, encompassing randomized controlled trials and observational data, highlighting MTX's effectiveness, differences in route of administration, safety profile, and limitations as they pertain to the management of IBD. As therapeutic targets for IBD evolve, we discuss MTX's future positioning by exploring clinical perspectives regarding its utility and examine the latest evidence that indicates there may be novel, previously unexplored, therapeutic potential. By bridging mechanistic insights with clinical evidence, this review underscores MTX's enduring, albeit niche, position in IBD therapy and highlights key areas for future investigation to optimize its use. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Methotrexate remains a valuable, though underutilized, therapeutic option for the management of inflammatory bowel disease. This review provides a comprehensive overview of methotrexate's pharmacology, integrating emerging mechanistic insights and clinical data to reframe its role beyond immunomodulation, particularly at the gastrointestinal mucosal interface, thereby identifying novel avenues for future research that may expand its clinical utility in inflammatory bowel disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.