Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41951103›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea)2026

Beyond Weight Loss: Skeletal Considerations in Obesity Treatment.

Myung Jin Kim, Yun Kyung Cho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Myung Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
Yun Kyung ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yukycyk@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of obesity therapeutics, led by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and metabolic surgery, has achieved unprecedented weight loss. However, the skeletal consequences of such substantial weight reduction are of increasing clinical concern. This review explores the relationship between obesity, weight-loss modalities, and bone health. While obesity was historically viewed as bone-protective due to mechanical loading, recent evidence highlights qualitative bone deterioration and sitespecific fracture risks. Intentional weight loss through caloric restriction or bariatric surgery consistently accelerates bone turnover and reduces bone mineral density (BMD), with surgical interventions showing the most significant impact. Emerging data on GLP-1RAs suggest modest BMD declines, largely proportional to weight loss and likely driven by mechanical unloading. Conversely, preclinical studies indicate that GLP-1 signaling may exert direct osteoanabolic and anti-resorptive effects. To preserve skeletal integrity, obesity management must shift toward a holistic body composition framework. Integrating structured resistance exercise, optimizing nutrition (calcium, vitamin D, and protein), and implementing skeletal monitoring in high-risk individuals are essential. Future obesity care should prioritize the maintenance of bone quality and lean mass alongside fat reduction to ensure long-term skeletal resilience and prevent fragility fractures.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesityWeight LossAnimalsBone DensityCaloric RestrictionHumansAnti-obesity agentsBariatric surgeryBone densityExerciseIncretin mimeticsObesity

Identifiers

PMID41951103
PMCPMC13172636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.