ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Blood glucose testing modalities utilized by people with type 2 diabetes in a secondary care setting.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a highly prevalent condition worldwide. Many patients with T2D monitor blood glucose regularly to guide their diabetes management. In recent years continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). CGM can result in improved glycemic control, fewer diabetes-related hospital admissions and improved quality of life. In Ireland, however, CGM is not currently reimbursed for people with T2D, even those who are insulin-treated. The goal of the present study was to examine the glucose monitoring modalities used by patients attending diabetes outpatient clinics in a secondary care setting in Ireland. The proportions using SMBG and CGM and the patients' diabetes medications were recorded. Data were collected through a self-administered survey from participants attending outpatient diabetes clinics. We found that, of 137 patients surveyed, only 17 (12%) were using CGM for blood glucose monitoring, while 102 (75%) were using SMBG; the remainder were not testing glucose. Amongst 45 patients on insulin therapy, 15 (33%) were using a CGM, and 29 (64%) were using SMBG. This study highlights that a preponderance of patients with T2D in a representative Irish secondary care cohort do not use CGM for blood glucose monitoring, even amongst those on insulin therapy. These findings underscore the lack of access to CGM amongst patients with T2D on insulin in Ireland, which is potentially compromising their level of care and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41951918What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.