ArticleBMC primary care2026
Barriers and facilitators of adherence to cervical cancer screening follow-up among women living with HIV in South Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen living with human immune deficiency (WLWH) had higher risk of developing cervical cancer. Recurrence of the lesions is higher among WLWH than HIV negative women. Effective follow-up is very crucial in order to reduce the persistence of the lesions and avoid recurrence. However, less than half of the women attend yearly follow up in Ethiopia. This study investigated the barriers and facilitators of screening follow-up from the perspectives of WLWH and healthcare providers.
objectivesTo explore the barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening follow-up among WLWH who were treated for pre-cancer lesions in the West Arsi Zone, South Ethiopia.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted among 18 participants (12 WLWH and 6 healthcare providers) in two hospitals and two health centers in West Arsi Zone from January 1 to February 28, 2025. Participants were selected via purposive sampling technique. Data were collected using a semi-structured in-depth interview guide. ATLAS.ti version 25.0.1 was used for data analysis. Data were transcribed, translated verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by the Social Ecological Model (SEM). Findings were reported using texts and quotations in line with the SEM framework.
resultsThe major barriers were lack of awareness, fear, lack of money, poor counseling, gender preference, lack of privacy, stigma, traditional medicine and religious practices. On the other hand, having awareness, phone reminders, male partner support, good provider approach, free services and availability of alternative treatment options were identified as facilitators of follow-up.
conclusionThere are unique challenges facing WLWH cervical cancer screening adherence in Ethiopia. Ensuring compassionate and respectful care with availability of more female providers is crucial. Continuous awareness creation campaigns, empowering women, involving male partners, and promoting human papilloma virus (HPV) self-test could avert most of the identified barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.