Evidence mapPaperPMID 41952907Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Transforaminal intradiscal steroid injection versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection for chronic discogenic low back pain with active discopathy: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Jipeng Song, Shijie Liu, Wancheng Lin, Siyuan Yao, Yao Zhang, Meng Yi, Zhengning Luo, Lixiang Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jipeng Song *Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shijie Liu *Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wancheng Lin *Department of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Siyuan YaoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yao ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meng YiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhengning LuoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lixiang DingDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic discogenic low back pain (DLBP) with active discopathy (Modic type 1 changes) is a specific and debilitating phenotype. Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TESI) and transforaminal intradiscal steroid injection (TISI) are commonly used treatments, yet their comparative efficacy remains uncertain due to a lack of high-quality, direct comparative studies. Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of TISI versus TESI and to investigate whether the anatomical target of corticosteroid delivery (intradiscal vs. epidural) influences clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with chronic DLBP with active discopathy. Trial design: This is a single-center, prospective, parallel-group, assessor- and patient-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Methods: A total of 118 eligible participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either TISI or TESI. The primary outcome is the change in low back pain intensity from baseline to 1-month post-intervention, measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes, assessed at multiple time points up to 12 months, include longitudinal pain intensity (NRS), functional status (Oswestry Disability Index, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score), health-related quality of life (12-item Short Form Health Survey), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), radiological changes (Modic classification, intervertebral disc heigh and Pfirrmann grade), and the incidence of procedure-related adverse events. The primary analysis will follow the modified intention-to-treat principle, with longitudinal data analyzed using a linear mixed model. Discussion: This trial addresses a critical evidence gap by conducting a direct head-to-head comparison of two mechanistically distinct injection therapies. The findings are anticipated to significantly inform clinical practice and guide the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms for managing chronic low back pain with active discopathy. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University (IIT2024-032-003). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences, regardless of the outcome. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2500096006, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=249912.

Indexed as

active discopathydiscogenic low back painrandomized controlled trial protocoltransforaminal epidural steroid injectiontransforaminal intradiscal steroid injection

Identifiers

PMID41952907
PMCPMC13055177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.