ArticleMetabolism open2026
Efficacy and safety of semaglutide injection in comparison with reference semaglutide for chronic weight management in indian adults with obesity: A phase III randomized non-inferiority trial.
Article in Metabolism open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In India, approximately 33-46% people are obese which is a major risk factor to several non-communicable diseases. Amongst all existing treatment modalities, semaglutide injection is the proven most effective glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist for obesity, but high costs limit global accessibility. We report the Phase III trial evaluating the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of a novel formulation of Semaglutide Injection in Indian patients with obesity. Methods: This multicentre, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial enrolled 282 Indian adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m Results: In terms of primary endpoint, Least squares mean (LSM) was -11.25% (Test Product) versus -11.50% (reference semaglutide), with a treatment difference of 0.25% (95% CI: -0.72 to 1.23), at the end of 24 weeks confirming non-inferiority. 90.4% and 58.0% of Test Product-treated participants achieved ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss, respectively. Adverse events were similar between groups (63.3% vs 62.8%), with predominantly mild gastrointestinal symptoms. No serious treatment-related adverse events, deaths, or discontinuations occurred. Conclusions: This novel formulation of Semaglutide Injection demonstrated therapeutic non-inferiority to the reference product with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Trial registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2025/03/082620).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.