ArticleHuman mutation2026
Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is characterized by a complex tumor microenvironment and poor prognosis, yet the roles of specific tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) subpopulations in driving disease progression remain elusive. Methods: This study evaluated the prognostic relevance of Results: HGSOC patients classified as high risk exhibited poorer survival outcomes, increased infiltration of M2-like macrophages, elevated expression of immune checkpoints, and enrichment of immune- and ferroptosis-related pathways. Trajectory and copy number variation analyses revealed stage-specific gene expression patterns and amplification-associated regulation. Drug-gene association analyses further suggested that high-risk patients may be more responsive to targeted therapies and proteasome inhibitors, whereas low-risk patients may benefit from conventional chemotherapy. Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.