ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Wearable Sleep Measures May Improve Machine Learning Prediction of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Engagement Among Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether incorporating baseline sleep measures from a wrist-worn activity monitor in machine learning (ML) models improved the prediction of 12-week engagement with home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patients and Methods: Among participants with a prior COPD exacerbation (n=124), sleep measures were collected for 1 week before HBPR and processed (1) using a validated Tudor-Locke algorithm and (2) applying partial least squares-discriminant analysis to generate the Composite Sleep Health Score. Engagement was defined as completion of one or more recommended activities/week for the 12-week duration. Nested model comparisons for logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, and Naïve Bayes ML models were performed to determine if including sleep measures improved engagement prediction. Results: In models adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, current smoker status, modified Medical Research Council score, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the inclusion of the Composite Sleep Health Score significantly improved the prediction of 12-week engagement only in support vector machine models (area under the curve=0.716; Conclusion: These proof-of-concept findings support additional investigation into the use of wearable-derived sleep measures in parametric ML models to improve screening for HBPR eligibility, identifying patients who will clinically benefit from fully remote PR. Future researchers should carefully select predictors when elucidating the link between wearable sleep measures and HBPR outcomes in patients with COPD.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.