Evidence mapPaperPMID 41954166Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Benmelstobart Plus Anlotinib Is Unlikely to Be Cost-Effective for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Integrated Disease Burden and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Haiyan Xu, Liejiong Wang, Ying Lou, Zhaoqi Qiu, Feng Xuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haiyan XuZhuji Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing, China.
Liejiong WangZhuji Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing, China.
Ying LouZhuji Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing, China.
Zhaoqi QiuZhuji Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing, China.
Feng XuanZhuji Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Shaoxing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-5079-4385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney cancer (KC) is an important public-health challenge in China. Although benmelstobart plus anlotinib (BEN + AL) improves survival compared with sunitinib (SUN) for advanced renal cell carcinoma, its economic value in the Chinese healthcare system remains uncertain. Epidemiological trends in KC incidence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in China from 1990 to 2023 were assessed using Global Burden of Disease 2023 data, including joinpoint regression, decomposition analysis, age- and sex-specific patterns. A partitioned survival model was developed to compare BEN + AL with SUN, informed by the phase 3 ETER100 trial. Outcomes included total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $ 26 896 per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess model stability. From 1990 to 2023, incident KC cases in China increased from 19 500 to 61 323, with the age-standardized incidence rate rising from 1.99 to 3.24 per 100 000, particularly among males. DALYs nearly doubled from 326 005 to 582 244, while the age-standardized DALY rate remained stable. Decomposition analysis showed that incidence growth was driven mainly by epidemiological change and population aging, whereas increases in DALYs were largely attributable to aging, partially offset by epidemiological improvements. In the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis, BEN + AL yielded higher effectiveness (4.67 LYs and 3.48 QALYs) than SUN (3.81 LYs and 2.73 QALYs) but at markedly higher cost ($ 192 292.58 vs $ 11 400.59), resulting in an ICER of USD 240 961.36 per QALY. Sensitivity and scenario analyses consistently showed ICERs exceeding the WTP threshold, with progression-free survival value and benmelstobart cost emerged as the primary influencing factors. While the burden of KC in China continues to rise, particularly due to population aging, BEN + AL is unlikely to be cost-effective as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma under current pricing.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellCost-Benefit AnalysisIndolesKidney NeoplasmsQuinolinesChinaCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSunitinibanlotinibIndolesQuinolinesSunitinibbenmelstobartChinacost-effectiveness analysisdisability-adjusted life yearsglobal burden of diseasequality-adjusted life yearsrenal cell carcinomasunitinib

Identifiers

PMID41954166
PMCPMC13070163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.