Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954748›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2026

Time-dependent facilitation of homologous actions.

Raphael Hamel, Felix-Antoine Savoie, David Punt, Ned Jenkinson, Mark R Hinder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raphael HamelSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Felix-Antoine SavoieDépartement Des Sciences de La Santé, Université du Québec À Rimouski, Rimouski, Québec, Canada.
David PuntSchool of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ned JenkinsonSchool of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mark R HinderSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. mark.hinder@utas.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unimanual actions can interfere with or facilitate similar actions performed with the opposite hand, especially when in close temporal proximity. Across three sequential button-press experiments, we tested how effector homology – anatomical similarity between fingers – and temporal delays between actions shape these effects. Specifically, we examined whether a priming action altered the reaction time (RT) of a subsequent action. Compared with baseline unimanual RTs, we indexed slowing of the second action’s RT as interference, and quickening as facilitation. Priming with homologous actions (e.g., index finger-index finger) produced interference (RTs slower than baseline) for temporal delays ≤ 200 ms and facilitation (RTs faster than baseline) at temporal delays ≥ 400 ms. Priming with non-homologous actions (e.g., little finger-index finger) also produced interference at short temporal delays, but never resulted in facilitation. Critically, these patterns emerged whether the priming actions were performed with the opposite or the same hand, indicating that interference and facilitation do not depend on interhemispheric dynamics. Our results reveal a previously undocumented phenomenon whereby homologous actions separated by longer delays result in behavioural facilitation, challenging models that explain the interaction between parallel actions solely by competitive interhemispheric dynamics or central bottleneck processes. We propose that facilitation and interference flexibly coexist, and are shaped by effector homology and action timing. These findings extend current models of bimanual coordination and highlight new opportunities for enhancing motor performance and neurorehabilitation.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityPsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeFemaleFingersHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung AdultBimanual CoordinationHomologous ActionsMotor FacilitationMotor InterferenceMotor PreparationSequential Actions

Identifiers

PMID41954748
PMCPMC13065582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.