ReviewDrugs2026
Targeting Inflammation in Bronchiectasis.
Review in Drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is defined by chronic infection, dysregulated inflammation and impaired mucociliary clearance underpinning progressive structural lung injury. While airway infection remains a clinical hallmark, numerous studies demonstrate that excessive neutrophil-dominated inflammation is a key determinant of disease severity, exacerbation risk and quality of life. Recent developments have transformed our understanding of inflammatory drivers uncovering distinct inflammatory endotypes defined by dominant microbial species, pattern-recognition receptor activation, inflammasome signalling, Th17-associated cytokine networks and failures of mucosal immunity. The emerging roles of viral-bacterial interactions, fungi, pathobionts and the broader microbiome challenge the conventional infection-only paradigm and highlight gaps in current therapeutic strategies. Such developments underpin the rationale behind anti-inflammatory strategies in bronchiectasis, ranging from suppression of neutrophil-driven injury through direct neutrophil elastase or upstream dipeptidyl peptidase-1 (DPP-1) inhibition, to immunomodulatory macrolides, toward therapies aimed at recalibrating epithelial and mucosal homeostasis. While several antibacterial and anti-infective trials have produced mixed results, this is likely to reflect unresolved heterogeneity in microbiome composition and host immune signalling. In contrast, emerging anti-inflammatory strategies show strong positive signals, reinforcing the need for better endotyping and biomarker-guided patient selection. Here we synthesize recent mechanistic and clinical insights to propose a more integrated framework for understanding and ultimately targeting airway inflammation in bronchiectasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41954871What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.