Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41954885›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Clarifying the evidence and implications of prioritizing extended-release buprenorphine for opioid agonist treatment in Canada's federal correctional system.

Cayley Russell, Tony P George, Nitin Chopra, Bernard Le Foll, Flora I Matheson, Gillian Kolla, Jennifer Wyman, Benedikt Fischer, Nikki Bozinoff, Jürgen Rehm and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cayley RussellCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 250 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada. Cayley.Russell@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9634-9554
Tony P GeorgeAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 1001 Queen St. West, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nitin ChopraAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 1001 Queen St. West, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bernard Le FollCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 250 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Flora I MathesonInstitute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gillian KollaFaculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre (HSC), Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Dr, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Jennifer WymanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Benedikt FischerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nikki BozinoffAddictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 1001 Queen St. West, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jürgen RehmCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 250 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shannon LangeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, 250 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR FRN-193303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correctional Service Canada (CSC) recently revised its opioid agonist treatment (OAT) policy, designating extended-release injectable buprenorphine (XR-BUP; Sublocade) as the first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) in Canadian federal corrections. Methadone is now a second-line option, and buprenorphine/naloxone is no longer available, raising concerns regarding access, clinical autonomy, and equivalence of care. CSC cited clinical evidence suggesting advantages of XR-BUP, including reduced diversion, simplified dosing, and superior efficacy. One of the primary sources referenced for the policy revisions was a systematic review examining the feasibility and effectiveness of XR-BUP among correctional populations. Here, we clarify the findings and limitations of this review, and examine key implications of CSC's policy revision. While available evidence suggests that XR-BUP is a beneficial OAT option for incarcerated individuals, the literature remains preliminary, heterogeneous, and methodologically limited. It currently does not robustly support the use of XR-BUP as an exclusive replacement for established first-line OAT options. Restricting access to evidence-based OAT options among correctional populations risks undermining patient-centered care, continuity of treatment, and alignment with general clinical guidelines. Ideally, XR-BUP should be offered as a valuable addition, while preserving access to the full range of evidence-based OAT options.

Indexed as

Addiction medicineCorrectional populationsCriminal justiceOpioid agonist treatmentPolicySublocade

Identifiers

PMID41954885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.