Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41955228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

ATEdrug: A reliable human-in-the-loop annotation scheme for aspect term extraction and polarity detection in drug reviews.

Gunjan Ansari, Chandni Saxena, Shahab Saquib Sohail, Zain Hussain, Aziz Sheikh, Amir Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gunjan AnsariVIT Bhopal University, Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Chandni SaxenaThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shahab Saquib SohailDepartment of CSE, SEST, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Zain HussainEdinburgh Medical School, Univesity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-8289
Aziz SheikhNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amir HussainCentre of AI and Robotics, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance is vital for post-market drug safety monitoring. Traditional trials inadequately capture adverse reactions. Patient-generated opinions offer valuable insights but pose challenges due to limited availability, inefficient annotation scheme, and volume of drug reviews, indicating the need of automation. To address the challenge posed by the limited availability of annotated drug reviews, we introduce a novel mechanism of annotating drug reviews dataset through human intervention, specifically tailored for Aspect Term Extraction (ATE) and Polarity Detection (PD) in three medical conditions: Depression, Arthritis and Birth control, thereby making it publicly available to facilitate future research. We first designed, ATEdrug, an automated annotation scheme with minimal human intervention by employing an expert-driven rule-based approach. We further deploy ATEdrug for sequence labelling and classification tasks in drug reviews. The automatically labeled data is further used for training and testing of deep learning models: BERT, BioBERT, and ClinicalBERT, for clinical use. We manually evaluate the results through annotator agreement to validate the effectiveness of ATEdrug. The labeled dataset is further used to construct transformer-based models. Our proposed model is reliable, safe and trustworthy for healthcare domain, thereby eliminating the compromises with hallucination and data security through generative AI models. All experimental codes and data are available on GitHub (https://github.com/CMOONCS/ateDrug.git).

Indexed as

PharmacovigilanceDeep LearningDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41955228
PMCPMC13065005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.