ArticlePloS one2026
Women's experiences of communication with medical staff before and after emergency caesarean birth in Zambia: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication between patients and staff during emergency caesarean birth is important for ensuring positive outcomes and reducing the negative psychological impact of the procedure. Communication failures have been linked to obstetric violence, mistrust, and post-traumatic stress disorder. This study aimed to explore patient-healthcare provider communication before and after emergency caesarean birth at the University Teaching Hospitals, Women and Newborn Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative phenomenological design to explore the lived experiences of women who had undergone emergency caesarean birth. Interviews were conducted with 30 women who were purposively sampled from the hospital's wards. An inductive thematic analysis, which involved transcribing interviews, reading and rereading transcripts, coding, categorising similar codes and developing themes, was used for data analysis.
resultsThematic analysis yielded four primary themes: mode of communication, emergency caesarean birth communication experience, consequences of inadequate communication and information, and barriers to effective communication. Communication between healthcare providers and women who underwent emergency caesarean birth was inadequate, untimely and lacked detail about the surgical procedure. As a result, women felt afraid, angry, and anxious, resulting in a sense of worthlessness and helplessness. The use of medical jargon by healthcare providers, misconceptions about caesarean birth, the presence of pain and poor staff attitudes towards mothers were identified as some of the communication barriers.
conclusionThe findings highlight systemic gaps in provider-patient communication during emergency caesarean birth, influenced by workload pressures, staff shortages and power dynamics. Interventions are needed to promote respectful maternity care through training in patient centred communication, use of simple language, and addressing structural barriers at the University Teaching Hospitals Women and Newborn Hospital. Clear communication can help to improve the overall experience of caesarean birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.