ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2026
Using Natural Language Processing to Improve Fall Documentation in VA Nursing Home Residents.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveFalls can be deadly for older adults, making accurate documentation essential for prevention and quality improvement. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is used in nursing homes to document falls; however, it fails to capture fall dates and has been critiqued for underreporting and misclassification. We developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to extract fall dates from electronic health records (EHRs). This study outlines the NLP algorithm development and compares its findings with the MDS to evaluate misclassification and underreporting.
designRetrospective cohort study. SETTING AND
participantsAll veterans residing in long-term care between January 7, 2012 and December 31, 2024.
methodsA rule-based NLP algorithm was developed to identify fall dates in the EHR and validated with manual chart review. The NLP results (reference) were compared with the MDS v3.0 assessment to assess the concordance between the 2 data sources.
resultsWe identified 38,852 long-term care residents with a median length of stay of 204 days. About half (49.0%) of residents experienced at least 1 fall during their stay, as identified by either data source. The NLP algorithm achieved 96% accuracy against manual chart review. Using the NLP output as the reference standard, the MDS correctly identified 86.1% of residents with a fall in the EHR (F1-score = 0.885, and specificity = 0.930). However, 2430 (6.3%) residents had falls documented in their medical records that were never reported in the MDS, and 3.9% of MDS falls were not identified in the EHR (misclassification). The median time between a fall and an MDS assessment documenting a fall was 17 days. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The MDS identified 86% of NH residents with EHR documentation of a fall, but it did not provide the specific date of each fall. By supplementing MDS fall reporting with NLP, we may improve the sensitivity of fall detection and gain more precise information regarding when a fall occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.