ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2026
Rational design of lipid-based nanoparticles for targeted anticancer therapies.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted Immunoliposomal Delivery of a 5-Fluorouracil Analog in EGFR-Expressing Pancreatic Cancer Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Targeted anticancer therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, siRNA, small-molecule inhibitors, and PROTACs, offer precise treatments but face severe pharmacokinetic and biological barriers, such as poor bioavailability, limited tumor penetration, and off-target toxicity. While first-generation lipid-based nanoparticles (LBNPs) successfully utilized the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, relying exclusively on passive targeting is insufficient due to tumor heterogeneity. Therefore, this review provides an integrative analysis focused on the rational design of LBNPs. We systematically explore how the distinct structural complexities and biological barriers of each therapeutic modality strictly dictate specific LBNP design rules. The optimization of various nanocarriers-including liposomes, solid-lipid nanoparticles, and nanostructured lipid carriers-is discussed through customized lipid compositions, surface functionalization for active targeting, and the incorporation of ionizable lipids to overcome intracellular barriers like endosomal entrapment. Furthermore, these structural designs are correlated with optimal administration routes, and the impact of formulation methods is evaluated by contrasting traditional emulsification with advanced continuous platforms like microfluidics and supercritical fluid technology. Finally, the clinical landscape and translational challenges of approved and experimental nanomedicines are assessed. We conclude that the transition from bench to bedside is currently hindered less by preclinical efficacy and more by manufacturing and regulatory bottlenecks. Overcoming chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) challenges, ensuring robust industrial scalability, and establishing harmonized regulatory frameworks are critical priorities for the future clinical success of targeted nanomedicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.