ArticleScientific reports2026
Secondary findings after multi-gene panel testing in 7,388 patients with suspected cancer predisposition syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study focused on the individuals’ preference for disclosure of secondary findings (SF) in hereditary cancer genes (HCG) and the frequency and type of SF after multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) in individuals with a suspected cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS). SF are defined as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPV) that were not anticipated and without a known correlation to the primary indication for genetic testing. 7,388 individuals with a suspected CPS were tested in a 6-year period 2019–2024. SF in HCG were reported in agreement between clinical and laboratory geneticists. Data about the reported SF and preference to receive SF was acquired from patient medical documentation. Our study showed that majority of patients (98.8%) opted-in for disclosure of SF. We identified 42 SF (0.57% of all tested individuals) in 41 individuals. 11 were found in the HCG from the ACMG list, 28 in HCG not included in ACMG list and 3 were discovered in mosaic form. Our study provides important insight into frequency and type of SF in HCG in a cohort of individuals with suspected CPS. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to better define the usefulness and potential risks of reporting SF in HCG in individuals without personal/family history of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.