Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41957288›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Secondary findings after multi-gene panel testing in 7,388 patients with suspected cancer predisposition syndrome.

Eva Avsec, Ana Blatnik, Vita Šetrajčič Dragoš, Petra Škerl, Vida Stegel, Mateja Krajc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva AvsecDepartment of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Ana BlatnikDepartment of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Vita Šetrajčič DragošDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Petra ŠkerlDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Vida StegelDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Mateja KrajcDepartment of Clinical Cancer Genetics, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. mkrajc@onko-i.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0605-2592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our study focused on the individuals’ preference for disclosure of secondary findings (SF) in hereditary cancer genes (HCG) and the frequency and type of SF after multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) in individuals with a suspected cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS). SF are defined as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPV) that were not anticipated and without a known correlation to the primary indication for genetic testing. 7,388 individuals with a suspected CPS were tested in a 6-year period 2019–2024. SF in HCG were reported in agreement between clinical and laboratory geneticists. Data about the reported SF and preference to receive SF was acquired from patient medical documentation. Our study showed that majority of patients (98.8%) opted-in for disclosure of SF. We identified 42 SF (0.57% of all tested individuals) in 41 individuals. 11 were found in the HCG from the ACMG list, 28 in HCG not included in ACMG list and 3 were discovered in mosaic form. Our study provides important insight into frequency and type of SF in HCG in a cohort of individuals with suspected CPS. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to better define the usefulness and potential risks of reporting SF in HCG in individuals without personal/family history of cancer.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultGenetic testingHereditary cancerSecondary findings

Identifiers

PMID41957288
PMCPMC13199422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.