ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable hybrid machine learning model for predicting stunting and identifying key risk factors among Ethiopian children under five.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood stunting, caused by poor nutrition, infections, and inadequate stimulation, impairs growth and development. This leads to reduced cognitive function and academic performance, increased risk of illness and death due to weakened immunity, lower economic productivity, and higher susceptibility to chronic diseases in adulthood. Childhood stunting is a major issue in low-income countries like Ethiopia. Children’s stunting prevalence in Ethiopia is 35.4%, highlighting the need for interventions. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies stunting as normal, moderate, and severe. The study aims to develop an advanced explainable hybrid predictive model by combining two top-performing algorithms, Extra Tree (ensemble learning) and Multilayer Perceptron (deep learning), to leverage their complementary strengths. This approach enhances accuracy and reveals the inner workings of AI decision-making. The central goal of this study is to move beyond black box models by using post-hoc explainability methods like Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations. This is intended to reveal the inner workings of the artificial intelligence decision-making and identify the key risk factors associated with stunting to build trust for public health policy design. In this study, data from the 2019 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey dataset were used for the experiment. The data was preprocessed to ensure high quality for analysis and to build a model predicting childhood stunting. This study employed an experimental research methodology to conduct five experiments, involving 11,121 instances and 17 features. While we developed the model using a balanced dataset, we evaluated it on the original dataset to avoid inflating performance metrics. The experiments showed that the hybrid model constructed from Extra Tree and Multilayer Perceptron performed better than others, achieving an accuracy of 94%. The hybrid model identified age_of_child, Region, Birth_Interval, and number of children under five in the household as the most influential predictors of stunting status in this dataset. It is essential to note that these are predictive risk factors, representing strong statistical associations within the cross-sectional data, and should not be interpreted as definitive causal drivers of stunting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.