ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Host gene expression analysis in the detection of bacterial and viral etiology in children hospitalized with a suspected severe infection.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHost gene expression profiling holds great potential in improving the differential diagnostics of bacterial and viral infections. We investigated its discriminative value in children with suspected serious infections.
methodsPeripheral blood gene expression profiles were analyzed by RNA sequencing in 268 children aged between 4 weeks and 16 years: 211 hospitalized due to a suspected severe infection, 15 with a confirmed viral respiratory tract infection managed as outpatients, and 42 healthy control children. We classified children according to the bacterial, viral, or other etiology of their final diagnosis, and determined expression profiles. We derived 2-transcript signatures discriminating bacterial infections and viral-bacterial co-infections from viral infections in a discovery group (n = 101) of children with respiratory tract infections and validated them in children (n = 109) with non-respiratory infections, including cases with probable and mixed etiologies in the analyses.
resultsHere, we show that clustering of blood transcriptome cannot be unequivocally explained by the etiology of infection. A 2-transcript signature comprising TSPO and SECISBP2 genes differentiates bacterial and viral-bacterial co-infections from viral infections with an area under the curve of 0.93 and 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.98 and 0.82-0.92) in the discovery and discovery plus validation groups, respectively. Both groups combined, the sensitivity is 77%, and specificity 87%.
conclusionsThe identified 2-transcript signature demonstrates good accuracy in distinguishing between bacterial and viral infections in a complex population of children hospitalized for suspected severe infection. Heterogeneity of clinical manifestations needs to be considered in diagnostic gene expression studies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.