ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in fibrotic ILD: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComorbidities such as systemic hypertension, coronary artery disease, and pulmonary hypertension are common in interstitial lung diseases. These conditions may significantly affect treatment choice, outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Few studies have investigated cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and data on CI in hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate CI in a cohort of patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease and to examine associated factors, including depression, anxiety, and their effects on HRQL.
methodsNinety-four patients with F-ILD were included in the study, and cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Turkish version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-TR). Depression and anxiety were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HRQL was evaluated using the Short Form-36 (SF-36).
resultsOf the 94 patients included, 61 (64.9%) were male, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 63.6 (SD: 10.6) years, and 62.8% had a history of smoking. The cohort included 45 (47.9%) with IPF and 49 (52.1%) with fibrotic HP patients. The mean FVC% predicted, and DLCO% were 72.2% (SD: 18.6) and 55.7% (SD: 20.7), respectively, and the mean 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance was 350 (SD: 111) m. The mean MMSE and MoCA-TR scores were 22.3 (SD: 5.5) and 18.9 (SD: 5.7), both below established cutoff values. CI was identified in 51.1% of patients using MMSE and in 66.0% using MoCA-TR. Notably, MMSE-defined CI was more frequent in females, nonsmokers, patients with higher BMI, and those with anxiety, and was associated with lower physical functioning scores on SF-36. In contrast, when CI was defined by MoCA-TR, only a shorter 6MWT distance was related to CI. Depression and anxiety were present in 35 (37.2%) and 21 (22.3%) patients, respectively. Patients with anxiety were older than those without anxiety (68.9 (SD: 8.4) vs. 62.1 (SD: 10.7), p = 0.009), and anxiety was more frequent in females as well. Although BMI, DLCO%, 6MWT distance, and SF-36 subdomain scores demonstrated weak associations with cognitive scores, these findings help us better understand patient variability.
conclusionCI was observed in more than half of patients with F-ILD and was associated with functional limitations, anxiety, and impaired HRQL. Awareness of CI in this patient population is essential for healthcare professionals, as it may facilitate appropriate assessment, individualized patient-centered approaches, and the implementation of supportive care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.