ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026
Procedural Treatments as Adjuncts in the Management of Acne Vulgaris: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the pilosebaceous unit and one of the most prevalent dermatological conditions globally. Its multifactorial pathogenesis and variable clinical presentation necessitate a multimodal therapeutic approach. While pharmacological interventions remain first-line therapy, cosmetic and dermatologic procedures are increasingly utilized as adjunctive strategies to enhance clinical outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on four commonly employed cosmetic modalities in acne management: chemical peels, mechanical peels, light-based therapies, and radiofrequency-assisted microneedling.
aimThe aim of this study is to evaluate the role of procedural treatments as adjunctive options in the management of acne vulgaris.
methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus with no time restrictions, focusing on patients with acne vulgaris and adjunct cosmetic/procedural interventions.
resultsGiven the narrative scope, this was a non-comprehensive, non-exhaustive evidence synthesis, with treatment options organized thematically. Overall, these cosmetic procedures can provide meaningful adjunctive benefits when integrated into individualized acne treatment plans. However, variability in study designs, procedural parameters, and outcome measures limits direct comparison across modalities. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to establish standardized protocols and to determine long-term safety and efficacy.
conclusionsProcedural treatments can serve as valuable adjuncts in the management of acne vulgaris by enhancing therapeutic outcomes and addressing treatment-resistant cases. However, individualized treatment selection and further high-quality studies are needed to optimize their use and long-term benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.