Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41958401›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Co-Creation of Interventions to Promote Critical Health Literacy in the Community: Study Protocol.

Sandro Zacher, Martin Kalteis, Gabriele Meyer, Anke Steckelberg, Jana Hinneburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Co-Creation of Interventions to Promote Critical Health Literacy in the Community: Study Protocol.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandro ZacherInstitute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle (saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3549-0455
Martin KalteisInstitute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle (saale), Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-4222-8651
Gabriele MeyerInstitute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle (saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3188-2902
Anke SteckelbergInstitute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle (saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8687-3149
Jana HinneburgInstitute of Health, Midwifery and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, University Medicine Halle, Halle (saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7154-9418

Funding

Ministry of Science, Energy, Climate Protection and Environment of the State of Saxony-Anhalt FKZ I 296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA new community centre in a district with a high amount of equity deserving populations in Halle (Saale), Germany provides a space to design and implement health-related services that reflect the needs and priorities of local residents. Health information often fails to meet existing quality standards. Therefore, strengthening critical health literacy is essential. Co-creation is a participatory approach that addresses needs by involving community members as equal partners in the joint development of ideas, concepts and interventions. The study aims to co-create interventions with residents of the community to promote critical health literacy.

methodsThe study will be conducted as an iterative co-creation process and feasibility study using both qualitative and quantitative methods, based on the PRODUCES+ framework and guided by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. In phase I, co-creators engage in a multi-step co-creation process involving participatory workshops and focus group interviews to explore community health needs, information behaviours and to co-develop tailored interventions. Interest-holders representing local institutions are continuously involved to ensure contextual relevance and sustainability. The co-creation process will be evaluated using the PROSECO framework. In phase II, the developed interventions will undergo feasibility testing and pilot implementation within the newly established community centre, using qualitative and quantitative methods such as think-aloud, observations, interviews and questionnaires.

conclusionsThe study is expected to develop interventions that will strengthen critical health literacy and empower residents to make informed health decisions. It will also provide insights into mechanisms and success factors of co-creation.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth LiteracyHealth PromotionFeasibility StudiesFocus GroupsGermanyHumansResearch Designco‐creationcommunity healthcritical health literacyfeasibility studyhealth disparitieshealth promotionparticipationstakeholder

Identifiers

PMID41958401
PMCPMC13066911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.