SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Machine learning in neuroimaging for predicting H3K27M mutations in diffuse midline gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of neuroimaging-based machine learning (ML) models for non-invasive prediction of H3K27M mutations in diffuse midline gliomas (DMG). Methods: Following PRISMA-DTA guidelines, we searched four databases up to May 2025 to identify eligible studies evaluating neuroimaging-based ML for predicting H3K27M mutations in DMG. Study quality was assessed using PROBAST+AI and GRADE. Bivariate random-effects models were used to pool sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Sixteen studies were included, comprising 2,357 patients in internal validation cohorts and 1,792 patients in external validation cohorts. MRI-based ML models showed strong diagnostic performance in internal validation, with pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.75-0.87), and AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93). For PET/CT-based ML models, pooled sensitivity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.44-0.71) and pooled specificity was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.81), with an AUC of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.57-0.66). MRI-based ML showed significantly higher sensitivity ( Conclusion: MRI-based ML demonstrates high accuracy and generalizability for non-invasive H3K27M prediction in DMG, seemingly outperforming current PET/CT-based ML. The adoption of DL architectures and DNA sequencing as the reference standard may further improve performance, supporting the clinical utility of MRI-based ML for molecular stratification. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=1078673, identifier CRD420251078673.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.