ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a prediction model for primary non-response to IL-17A inhibitors in psoriasis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, but a substantial proportion of patients experience primary non-response during the early treatment phase. Objectives: To identify clinical predictors of primary non-response to IL-17A inhibitors and to develop and validate a prediction model for individualized risk assessment. Methods: A total of 617 patients initiating IL-17A inhibitors in the Shanghai Psoriasis Effectiveness Evaluation Cohort (SPEECH) were randomly allocated into a training set ( Results: In the training cohort, 23.2% of patients met the definition of primary non-response. Clinical predictors included higher BMI, absence of family history of psoriasis, prior biologic exposure, and higher baseline PASI score. In addition to these clinical factors, failure to achieve PASI40 at week 4 was a strong indicator of subsequent non-response. The final prediction model exhibited strong discrimination (AUC 0.766, 95% CI, 0.690-0.842), good calibration between predicted and observed probabilities, and meaningful clinical usefulness as demonstrated by DCA. Performance remained robust in both the internal validation cohort (AUC 0.706) and the external validation cohort (AUC 0.708). An online calculator was developed to facilitate individualized risk estimation. Conclusion: This study identified key baseline and early-response predictors of primary non-response to IL-17A inhibitors and established a validated prediction model with clinical utility. The web-based tool may support precision decision-making in psoriasis management by enabling early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.