SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Gut microbiome differences by serostatus in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease in which serological status, defined by rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), influences disease course. Alterations of the gut microbiome have been implicated in RA, but differences between seropositive and seronegative patients, and between seropositive RA and healthy controls, have not been systematically reviewed. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched to July 2025 for observational studies of adult RA patients reporting RF and/or ACPA status with gut microbiome analysis. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: Eight studies published between 2016 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Six investigated both RF and ACPA, while two focused primarily on ACPA. In seropositive RA, higher abundances of Conclusions: Seropositive RA, especially ACPA-positive, is frequently associated with reduced microbial diversity and distinct compositional shifts compared with seronegative RA and healthy controls. Larger standardized studies are required to validate these associations and assess their biomarker potential. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251140715.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.