ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distinct cellular DNA methylation mechanisms underlie common and rare genetic risk for brain disorders.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noncoding genetic variation contributes to brain disorder risk, but the mechanisms through which it acts in specific brain cell types remain unclear. DNA methylation (DNAm), a highly cell type-specific regulatory layer in the brain, may mediate noncoding genetic risk, yet whether methylation at CG (mCG) and neuron-enriched non-CG (mCH) dinucleotides contribute differently to that risk remains unknown. Here we develop a deep learning framework that predicts DNAm from DNA sequence and estimates variant effects across 186 brain cell subtypes in both mCG and mCH, leveraging single-nucleus DNAm profiles from 46 brain regions. The models reveal distinct transcription factor (TF) programs underlying the two methylation contexts, with mCH-associated TFs showing stronger evolutionary constraint. Predicted variant effects agree closely with cell type-matched mQTLs in both direction and magnitude. Common variants predicted to affect mCG, particularly in excitatory neurons, show substantially greater heritability enrichment for brain-related traits than variants affecting mCH. By contrast, noncoding
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.