Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41959514›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Unified Multi-Cohort Harmonisation and Normative Modelling of Neuroimaging Data via Hierarchical GAMLSS.

Mai P Ho, Nikita K Husein, Lei Fan, Rachel Visontay, Hollie Byrne, Emma K Devine, Lindsay M Squeglia, Perminder S Sachdev, Jiyang Jiang, Wei Wen and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mai P HoCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-9030
Nikita K HuseinCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lei FanCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rachel VisontayThe Matilda Centre for Mental Health and Substance Use, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hollie ByrneThe Matilda Centre for Mental Health and Substance Use, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Emma K DevineThe Matilda Centre for Mental Health and Substance Use, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lindsay M SquegliaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Perminder S SachdevCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jiyang JiangResearch Imaging New South Wales (RINSW), Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wei WenCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Louise MewtonThe Matilda Centre for Mental Health and Substance Use, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource CenterU24DA041123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ANDERS M DALE · 2015 to 2026
$51.5M
Adolescent Substance Use Initiation: Disentangling neurocognitive risks from consequences using longitudinal and genetically-informed methodsU01DA041120 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Monica Luciana, Sylia Wilson · 2015 to 2026
$34.5M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7M
Prospective Research Studies of Maturation (PRISM)- Research ProjectU01DA041134 · NIDA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ERIN MCGLADE, PERRY FRANKLIN RENSHAW · 2015 to 2026
$29.2M
ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECTU01DA041048 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI Megan Marie Herting, ELIZABETH R SOWELL · 2015 to 2026
$28.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
FIU-ABCD: Pathways and Mechanisms to Addiction in the Latino Youth of South FloridaU01DA041156 · NIDA · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Raul Gonzalez, Angela R Laird · 2015 to 2026
$22.8M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041148 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Damien A Fair, Rebekah S Huber · 2015 to 2026
$22.3M
ABCD-USA: NYC Research ProjectU01DA041174 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Arielle Ryan Baskin-Sommers, Betty J Casey · 2015 to 2026
$19.7M
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) ConsortiumU01DA041117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LINDA CHANG, THOMAS M ERNST · 2015 to 2026
$19.5M
15/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at LIBRU01DA050989 · NIDA · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI ROBIN L AUPPERLE, MARTIN P. PAULUS · 2020 to 2026
$14.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA031052NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030575NIA NIH HHS R01 AG057531NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057531NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041022NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041025NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041028NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041048NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041089NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041093NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041117NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041120NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041134NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041148NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041156NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041174NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050987NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050988NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050989NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051016NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051018NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051037NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051038NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA051039NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041123NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale neuroimaging studies increasingly pool data across multiple cohorts, scanners, and acquisition protocols, introducing technical between-cohort variation that must be addressed before meaningful biological inference can be drawn. Existing harmonisation methods, particularly ComBat-based approaches, have been widely adopted for this purpose. However, they remain limited by Gaussian assumptions and by their focus on location or location-scale correction. In this study, we propose a unified hierarchical Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) framework for multi-cohort harmonisation and normative modelling of structural neuroimaging data. The framework models cohort effects directly within all fitted distributional parameters, accommodates any parametric family for which exact inverse mapping is available, and returns harmonised values on the original measurement scale through centile-based quantile mapping. Normative deviation scores are obtained as a direct by-product of the same fitted model, enabling harmonisation and normative inference to be conducted jointly. The method was evaluated in a pooled longitudinal dataset comprising 88,126 observations across 237 structural neuroimaging features from six cohorts spanning childhood to late life: ABCD, IMAGEN, NCANDA, LIFE, UK Biobank, and MAS. Harmonisation performance was compared with ComBat, ComBat-GAM, and ComBat-LS using complementary criteria assessing data retention, residual batch effects, preservation of age-related and sex-related biological signal, and coherence of postharmonisation lifespan trajectories. GAMLSS achieved near-complete removal of residual cohort effects, retained almost all valid observations post-harmonisation, and showed the strongest overall preservation of biological signal across validation metrics. In particular, it better preserved biologically plausible age trajectories for distributionally complex features such as white matter hypointensity volume, while simultaneously providing harmonized native-scale values and normative deviation scores within a single framework. These findings suggest that hierarchical GAMLSS offers a flexible and practical alternative to existing ComBat-based methods for large-scale neuroimaging harmonisation, particularly for features with non-Gaussian residual distributions and settings where cohort effects extend beyond differences in mean and variance.

Indexed as

GAMLSSHarmonisationLifespan brain imagingMulti-cohort MRINormative modelling

Identifiers

PMID41959514
PMCPMC13060827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.