ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Cognitive and brain reserve in bilingual speakers with clinical AD variants.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBilingualism may confer resilience via enhanced neural integrity. However, evidence for bilingualism's neuroprotective effect is mixed, and studies across Alzheimer's disease (AD) variants are scarce. This study examined gray matter volume (GMV) differences between bilinguals and monolinguals with amnestic AD and logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA).
methodsIn 136 amnestic AD and 88 lvPPA participants with neuropsychological assessments and structural MRI, we analyzed differences between monolinguals and bilinguals within each variant, controlling for demographic covariates.
resultsAmnestic AD bilinguals exhibited less GMV in hippocampal, fusiform, and occipital regions compared to monolinguals. LvPPA bilinguals had less temporal and occipital volumes, but they had greater volumes in inferior parietal regions, which are considered a disease epicenter in lvPPA. Cognitive performance in monolinguals and bilinguals was comparable within variants. DISCUSSION: Bilingualism may support cognitive reserve (preserved cognition despite reduced GMV) in both AD variants, with additional brain reserve in lvPPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.