ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Smartphone video-based knee extension moments during chair rise relate to MRI measures of muscle function.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Preserving muscle function is essential for maintaining independence during aging, but muscle force-generating capacity is not commonly measured clinically due to a lack of accessible, sensitive tools. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides gold-standard measures of muscle volume and microstructure, which reflect force-generating capacity, while dynamometry quantifies peak joint moments during voluntary contraction. Both modalities are time-consuming and costly, so clinical and large-scale studies often rely on low-fidelity measures such as the time to complete the five times sit-to-stand test (5xSTS). OpenCap, a tool for quantifying musculoskeletal dynamics from smartphone videos, may provide an accessible and more informative approach to assessing muscle function. We evaluated whether OpenCap-derived knee extension moments during chair rise relate to MRI-based measures of quadriceps muscle volume and microstructure, using dynamometry as a comparator. Methods: Nineteen healthy adults of various ages (63.2% female, 57.8 ± 15.4 y, 30-78 y) underwent quadriceps MRI, dynamometry, and 5xSTS time with concurrent OpenCap data collection. Using MRI, we computed quadriceps volume and radial diffusivity (a measure related to fiber size). We standardized these features and summed to create a composite MRI score, reflecting muscle quantity and quality. We estimated peak knee extension moment using OpenCap during chair rise and via both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry. We compared OpenCap kinematics (torso angle) and dynamics (knee moment), 5xSTS time, and dynamometry to MRI measures of muscle function using linear regression; false discovery rate was controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Results: The OpenCap-derived knee extension moment was associated with quadriceps muscle volume (r=0.63, p=0.014) and radial diffusivity (r=0.61, p=0.016). Peak knee extension moments measured by both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry were correlated with muscle volume (r=0.66-0.75, p=0.002-0.009), but not with radial diffusivity (r=0.04-0.52, p=0.054-0.91). Both OpenCap and isokinetic dynamometry showed their strongest associations with the composite MRI score (r=0.77, p=0.002 and r=0.73, p=0.002, respectively). 5xSTS time and a kinematic feature (torso angle) were not associated with any MRI-derived measures (r=-0.16-0.35, p=0.22-0.97). Conclusions: Smartphone video-based joint moments associate with muscle size and microstructure, unlike time or kinematic features. OpenCap offers a scalable assessment of muscle force-generating capacity that can be conducted rapidly without specialized equipment, enabling higher-fidelity assessments of muscle function in the clinic and in large-scale studies where imaging and dynamometry are impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.