ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Nutritional Status of Children 0-59 Months Old and Household Enrollment in the
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Child malnutrition is a prevailing global public health concern especially in low- and middle-income countries. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programs were implemented to help address this problem. Objective: To determine the relationship between the nutritional status among 0-59 months old children and household enrollment in a Philippine CCT program, Methods: A cross-sectional study was employed to 392 children and mothers/primary caregivers in a rural municipality in Leyte. Stratified random sampling technique was used in selecting the participants. Anthropometric characteristics were measured for these 392 children and were classified as 4Ps and non-4Ps members. Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between the variables of interest. Results: 4Ps household beneficiaries had mothers/primary caregivers who were older and had fewer years of education. The 4Ps beneficiary households had more household members and had lower average monthly income compared to the non-beneficiaries. No significant differences were found between the 4Ps beneficiary and non-beneficiary households in terms of the household hunger scale, the mean age of the children, and the sex distribution of the children included in the study. Specific profile components were found to be correlated to the children's nutritional status. The age of the children was significantly associated to their length/height-for-age (L/HFA) wherein stunting was noted to occur among children older than 12 months of age. Maternal education was significantly associated to the weight-for-age (WFA) of the children. Children who were underweight had mothers/primary caregivers with fewer years of education. No significant correlation was found between the child's sex, age of the mother/primary caregiver, household size, average monthly household income, and household hunger scale and the children's nutritional status Lastly, there was no significant correlation between 4Ps household enrollment and the WFA and L/HFA status of the children. 4Ps household enrollment was, however, significantly correlated to the weight-for-length/height (WFL/H) or wasting status of the children. Conclusion: The 4Ps program has the potential to enhance the nutritional outcomes of children hence the need to maximize its gains. In addition, the relationship of different sociodemographic variables with the children's nutritional status reflects the complexity and multidimensionality of childhood malnutrition, implying the need for a holistic and multistakeholder approach in addressing the problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.