Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41960241›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

From diagnosis to dynamics: complex systems, transdiagnostics, and networks in forensic psychiatry.

Stefan Bogaerts, Erik Masthoff, Iris Frowijn, Elien De Caluwé, Petra Habets, Marija Janković, Lee Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan BogaertsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Erik MasthoffDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Iris FrowijnDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Elien De CaluwéDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Petra HabetsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Marija JankovićDepartment of Developmental Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Forensic psychiatry is characterized by highly complex case presentations, where co-morbidity, fluctuating symptoms, and elevated risk of disruptive behavior are central concerns. Traditional categorical diagnostic models, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), often fail to capture this clinical complexity. This article introduces an integrated framework that synthesizes three perspectives: complexity theory, transdiagnostic models, and network analysis. Methods: Using a hypothetical yet realistically constructed case (Mark), we demonstrate how these approaches can collectively lead to a richer clinical conceptualization and a more effective treatment strategy. Results: Complexity theory offers a dynamic lens through which symptoms are understood as emergent patterns within a feedback-sensitive system. The transdiagnostic approach shifts the focus toward cross-cutting psychological processes, such as emotion regulation and impulsivity, that often constitute the core of psychopathological issues. Network analysis further elucidates the interrelations between symptoms and processes and highlights central or "bridge" symptoms as potential focal points for intervention. Two conceptual network models of Mark's symptoms and underlying mechanisms illustrate how this integrated approach can enhance both diagnostic clarity and therapeutic precision. Instead of a fragmented treatment plan based on multiple discrete diagnoses, a coherent systemic perspective is established, guiding prioritization and clinical monitoring. Discussion: The discussion addresses the added value, practical applications, ethical considerations, and implementation challenges of this approach, particularly in forensic psychiatric contexts. This integrated conceptualization holds promise for renewing forensic diagnostics and treatment paradigms, shifting from static disorder classification to dynamic, person-centered networks.

Indexed as

complexity theoryforensic - psychiatric practiceforensic psychiatrynetwork analysistransdiagnostic approach

Identifiers

PMID41960241
PMCPMC13056645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.