ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Ketogenic metabolic therapy as a candidate adjunct for CBTp delivery in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) are managed with pharmacotherapy alongside psychosocial interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp). In routine services, uptake and completion of CBTp remain limited, and participation barriers disrupt initiation, retention, and between-session follow-through. Ketogenic metabolic therapy (KMT) is a dietary intervention intended to induce and maintain nutritional ketosis through carbohydrate restriction and a higher fat dietary pattern, with education, monitoring, and safety management integrated into care. Early reports utilizing KMT in SSDs describe improvements in domains that limit CBTp delivery, including sleep disruption, arousal and distress reactivity, mood instability, cognitive burden, and day to day functioning, while effects on positive symptoms remain uncertain and evidence is methodologically heterogeneous. This perspective article situates KMT within CBTp engagement frameworks and reframes an actionable question for clinical psychologists: whether KMT can reduce participation limiting factors enough to increase CBTp initiation, retention, and completion when psychotherapy is truncated by instability, cognitive burden, distress, or practical barriers. A care pathway model is outlined that organizes participation barriers across entry into therapy and continuity across transitions back to community care, with CBTp indicators proposed for evaluating adjunct impact. If future trials support this adjunct role, KMT may represent a practical strategy for increasing CBTp dose and strengthening access to recovery-oriented gains in coping, stability, and functional outcomes, even when positive symptoms persist or fluctuate. These elements form a clinically grounded conceptual model that specifies measurable indicators and testable decision points for evaluating KMT as an adjunct to CBTp delivery in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.