Evidence mapPaperPMID 41960430Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2026

STROBE-causal machine learning for the human microbiome: systematic review on methodological innovations and validation frameworks.

Issam Khelfaoui, Wenxin Wang, Akram Ismael Shehata, Hicham Meskher, Mohammed F El Basuini, Abdalla M A Mohamed, Mohamed F Abouelenein, Houssem Eddine Degha, Mayada Alhoshy, Islam I Teiba and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Issam KhelfaouiSchool of Public Health, Shantou University/Institute of Local Government Development, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Wenxin WangSchool of Public Health, Shantou University/Institute of Local Government Development, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Akram Ismael ShehataGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Hicham MeskherDepartment of Chemistry and Key Laboratory for Preparation and Application of Ordered Structural Materials of Guangdong Province, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Mohammed F El BasuiniKing Salman International University, South Sinai, Egypt.
Abdalla M A MohamedMedical College, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Mohamed F AboueleneinDepartment of Insurance and Risk Management, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Houssem Eddine DeghaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Faculty of New Technologies of Information and Communication, Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University, Ouargla, Algeria.
Mayada AlhoshyIndependent Researcher, Alexandria, Egypt.
Islam I TeibaBotany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Omnia MahmoudDepartment of Pharmacology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Seedahmed S MahmoudDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reproducibility crisis in causal microbiome research necessitates robust validation frameworks. Current studies often face inconsistent validation methods, limited interpretability, and a lack of standardized reporting, creating a gap in reliable causal inference. This systematic review evaluates over 60 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 to: (1) establish benchmarking standards leveraging synthetic data and biological plausibility assessments; (2) compare advanced causal machine learning (ML) methodologies, including Double/Debiased ML, Deep Instrumental Variables (Deep IV), and Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), in their application to microbiome-host systems; and (3) propose the STROBE-CML (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Causal Machine Learning) guidelines to standardize reporting practices. We emphasize critical innovations such as federated validation pipelines and time-series causal discovery frameworks that address these gaps by facilitating scalable, privacy-preserving, and reproducible inference across heterogeneous cohorts. A decision support tool is introduced to guide researchers in selecting appropriate causal ML approaches based on data structure, research question, and computational constraints. By synthesizing methodological advances with rigorous validation paradigms, this review provides a roadmap for generating reliable, biologically interpretable, and clinically translatable causal claims in microbiome science.

Indexed as

benchmarkingcausal machine learninghuman microbiomemicrobiome-host interactionsreporting guidelinesreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID41960430
PMCPMC13057537

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.