ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Rehabilitation interventions in bronchiectasis: expanding evidence, personalization, and clinical practice.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a chronic and heterogeneous respiratory disease characterized by irreversible airway dilation, recurrent infection, persistent inflammation, and progressive functional impairment. Pulmonary rehabilitation is consistently recommended in international guidelines as a core non-pharmacological intervention; however, its implementation in clinical practice remains inconsistent and access to comprehensive rehabilitation programmes remains limited despite strong guideline endorsement. Recent advances in disease conceptualization, particularly the treatable traits framework, together with growing evidence supporting exercise training, physical activity promotion, and digitally enabled care models, have expanded the scope and relevance of rehabilitation in bronchiectasis. This Mini Review synthesizes contemporary evidence on rehabilitation interventions, integrating established practices with emerging strategies, and critically discusses current controversies, research gaps, and future directions. While airway clearance and exercise training remain foundational, current European Respiratory Society guidance supports their use based on defined patient profiles and evidence strength, and increasing evidence supports individualized, multimodal rehabilitation approaches that incorporate physical activity promotion, adjunct interventions, home-based and tele-rehabilitation models, and patient-managed strategies. Persistent uncertainties regarding optimal prescription, implementation, and long-term outcomes underscore the need for patient-centered, phenotype-informed rehabilitation strategies. Broadening rehabilitation beyond traditional paradigms may enhance clinical relevance, improve functional outcomes, and better align care with the complex and evolving nature of bronchiectasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.