ArticleJournal of global health2026
Use of public primary care facilities, economic development, and the health service transition.
Article in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have large networks of public primary care facilities (PCF) to provide affordable and quality health services close to communities. Public PCFs are expected to serve as the principal source of primary care. This study documents the extent to which public PCFs are used for illnesses treatable at the primary care level, and investigates the association between public PCF use, economic development, and UHC achievement. Methods: A cross-section of Demographic and Health Surveys conducted after 2014 in 46 LMICs were analysed. The sources of medical advice for children seeking care outside their home for the following illnesses were identified - acute respiratory infections (ARI), diarrhoea, and fever. Results: There is considerable between-country variation in utilisation of public PCFs; in most countries public PCFs received less than half the patients seeking medical advice for conditions treatable at the primary care level. Second, economic development is associated with a 'health service transition' characterised by two related trends - decline in the share of patients seeking medical advice at public providers overall and at public PCFs, and a proportionate increase in the share of patients seeking medical advice at private providers; use of public PCFs declined by around 24 percentage points between the average low-income and middle-income country. However, most of the between-country variation in public PCF use was due to factors other than income. Third, cross-country regression analysis indicated that public PCF use was not associated with UHC achievement because a similar range of services are offered by private providers. Public PCF use was associated with lower catastrophic health expenditures. Conclusions: The changes in care-seeking patterns and use of public PCFs brought about by economic development makes it critical to re-think primary health care service delivery models and financial protection mechanisms in transition countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.