ArticleMolecular and cellular pediatrics2026
The conundrum in diagnosing Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in a large German pedigree with early-onset diabetes and a novel HNF1A variant.
Article in Molecular and cellular pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic screening for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) involves sequencing of the coding regions of known disease-associated genes. We describe the complex and challenging diagnostic journey of a patient with early-onset diabetes with a novel, intronic HNF1A variant likely affecting a branching site. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was diagnosed with diabetes at the age of 10 years after incidental hyperglycemia (HbA1c 8.1%, C-peptide 3.0 μg/dl), without polyuria, polydipsia, or weight loss. Type 1 diabetes associated autoantibodies were negative, but the patient had a strong family history of early-onset diabetes (classified as type 1 or type 2 diabetes). Initial genetic testing for HNF4A, GCK, HNF1A, and HNF1B coding regions (including exon/intron boundaries ± 20 bp) and MLPA were negative. Sulfonylureas provided good glycemic control until age 16, when insulin was added. At age 18, an expanded targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for MODY was also negative. At age 24, whole-exome-sequencing via NGS and additional analysis was conducted, focusing on synonymous and intronic variants, and revealed a heterozygous HNF1A variant (c.327-28A > G;p.?) in the patient and four affected relatives. The variant co-segregated with diabetes, and was predicted to affect splicing via branching site disruption, suggesting pathogenicity.
conclusionIn summary, this case highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach that combines clinical, biochemical, and extended genetic evaluation. When MODY is strongly suspected despite negative targeted testing, broader sequencing—including intronic and regulatory regions—should be pursued. Accurate variant interpretation remains essential to prevent misclassification and to optimize diagnosis, treatment, and understanding of the genetic complexity of monogenic diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.