ArticlePloS one2026
Pain processing and pain assessment in Huntington's disease: Study protocol of the Huntington's disease - PAIN study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06693466 (Pain Processing and Pain Assessment in Huntington's Disease a Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pain Processing and Pain Assessment in Huntington's Disease a Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease that causes motor (e.g., chorea) and non-motor symptoms (e.g., neurocognitive, neuropsychiatric and autonomic disturbances). Pain is a frequently reported non-motor symptom in HD, with a prevalence of around 40% in the manifest stage. Despite its high prevalence, patients with HD seem to be at risk for undertreatment of pain, as reflected by the lower analgesic use in HD in the advanced stages. The relatively low use of analgesics may result from under-recognition and inadequate assessment of pain, particularly in the advanced stages of HD. As HD progresses, pain recognition and assessment become increasingly challenging due to the emergence and progression of motor and neurocognitive symptoms. In contrast, the high prevalence of pain may be attributable to disturbances in the pain processing in terms of endogenous pain inhibition or pain facilitation. Despite the availability of specifically developed and internationally standardized experimental pain assessments to test psychometrics properties of observational pain scales and disturbances in pain processing, studies using these pain assessments in HD are too limited to permit definitive conclusions.
methodsA cross-sectional experimental study will be conducted in twenty genetically and clinically confirmed adult-onset HD patients. The primary aim is to assess the feasibility of the experimental design, which comprises three different standardized pain assessments, using a predefined feasibility checklist. DISCUSSION: If feasibility is demonstrated, future studies using the comprehensive experimental design, including individually tailored experimental painful stimuli, are expected to provide insight into the psychometric properties of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15) and the potential demonstration of altered pain processing in HD, supporting the development of improved pain management regimens. In particular, the motor symptoms (e.g., facial chorea) of HD may have an adverse impact on the psychometric properties of the PAIC15.
trial registrationTrial registration on ClinicalTrials.gov with number: NCT06693466. Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden, The Hague and Delft registration number: P24.014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.