Evidence mapPaperPMID 41962040Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Evaluating an Incentive-Based mHealth App for Physical Activity Promotion Using the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trial Model: Small Cohort Study.

Babac Salmani, Madison S Hiemstra, Harry Prapavessis, Leigh M Vanderloo, Marc S Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Babac SalmaniSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada, 1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-840X
Madison S HiemstraSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada, 1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-820X
Harry PrapavessisSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada, 1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0636-7316
Leigh M VanderlooParticipACTION, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4621-3717
Marc S MitchellSchool of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, Canada, 1 519-661-2111.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-9614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity remains a public health concern, with 42% (around 1 in 2) of women and 34% (around 1 in 3) of men in the United Kingdom, for example, failing to meet moderate-to-vigorous physical activity guidelines. To promote physical activity (PA) at scale, smartphone-based mHealth (mobile health) software apps offer a promising solution. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an mHealth app offering very small ("micro") financial incentives for PA in Leeds, United Kingdom. Methods: A 5-week single-arm proof-of-concept study was conducted with rolling recruitment among Caterpillar Health app users between September 12 and December 12, 2022 (Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trial model, phase IIa). Users earned microincentives in the form of "points," redeemable for consumer rewards (eg, movie tickets and gym passes), for meeting personalized daily step goals (US $0.13 per goal achieved; set using data from a 5-day baseline) and completing educational quizzes (US $0.33 per quiz). Descriptive statistics assessed feasibility outcomes (ie, reach, recruitment, retention, engagement, and acceptability) and preliminary effectiveness. Paired-samples t tests (P<.05) examined changes in weekly mean daily step count (from baseline) and step goal achievement over 5 weeks. Results: Of 285 app downloads, 46 users consented to participate (recruitment rate: 16.1%). Participants (mean age: 39.9, SD 11.1 y; 71.1%, 33/46 woman) had a baseline step count of 5598 (SD 2664) steps/day. A total of 25 participants remained engaged (ie, completed at least 1 quiz) at study week 5 (retention rate: 54.3%). Acceptability was high, with 75% of respondents (12/16) indicating they would recommend the app. Weekly mean daily step count did not significantly increase from baseline (mean difference 317, SD 2273, P=.53). Weekly daily step goal achievement rate (%) decreased from study week 1 to 5 (-23.23, SD 22.85, P=.02). Conclusions: Despite lower-than-expected recruitment and no statistically significant PA increase, relatively high engagement and acceptability suggest future pilot testing (Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trial model, phase IIb) of a refined intervention (eg, wider selection of loyalty reward partners) and modified study protocol (eg, simplified consent process) is warranted.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionMobile ApplicationsMotivationObesityAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineUnited Kingdombehavioral economicsdigital healthfinancial incentiveshealth behavior changemHealthphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID41962040
PMCPMC13068306

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.