SynthesisBMJ open respiratory research2026
Occupational exposure to toxic particles and risk of pulmonary sarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe onset of sarcoidosis is likely the result of a complex genetic-environment-immunological interaction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify occupational toxic particles associated with an increased risk of developing pulmonary sarcoidosis.
methodsPublications in English, published from January 2000 to January 2025, were searched in PubMed, Scopus and JSTOR. The risk of bias was assessed for all included studies. Sensitivity analyses stratified by study quality were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings and potential bias. To assess publication bias, a funnel plot was used when more than six studies were included in the analysis.
resultsFive categories of toxic particles were identified to be associated with increased risk of the onset of sarcoidosis: chemicals, inorganic dusts, metals, mixed dusts and fumes and organic dusts. The quantitative analysis includes data from 13 studies. The results suggested that occupational silica, pesticides, mould/mildew and World Trade Center ((WTC) dust exposures were associated with increased odds of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the association for WTC dust and mould, whereas the risk associated with silica appeared attenuated in high-quality studies. However, gold exposure was identified as a protective factor.
conclusionPulmonary sarcoidosis is associated with occupational silica, pesticides, WTC dust and mould. Future research should prioritise gene-environment interactions and granuloma mineralogy to refine preventive strategies and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.